Links: Active vs. Passive Media, Games in Mainstream Media & Game Night with Catchphrase

Links: Active vs. Passive Media, Games in Mainstream Media & Game Night with Catchphrase
Board Game: Seasons
• Board Game Muse has a short interview with designer Régis Bonnessée about his game Seasons – debuting at Gen Con 2012 – and his other interests.

• Daniel Tack at Forbes.com writes about Gary Games' SolForge, showing multiple (preliminary) screenshots and explaining the game in a bit more detail. I had no idea that Forbes had someone writing about online gaming, collectible card games, and tabletop games...

• Erik Wecks at Wired's Geekdad marvels at Target's recent gaming coups – exclusivity for Star Trek: Catan, and a game cross-promotion deal with Geek & Sundry – and urges local game stores to up their game to survive and even profit from such happenings.

• Adam August at Kicktraq provides a few stats on board and card game Kickstarter projects, focusing on the growth of both backers and pledges in 2012 when compared to 2011:

From gallery of W Eric Martin

From gallery of W Eric Martin

• On his GamerChris blog, Chris Norwood tries to pin down the difference between board games and other media, focusing on whether they're active or passive media and how that relates to both the user experience and the requirements for critical analysis of the works. A long excerpt:

Quote:
In more or less all other media (even including many videogames, considering their mostly linear format) the underlying idea is that one "author" creates something that is then received/consumed by other individuals. The author has a great deal of control over how the medium is received, the message that is delivered, and ultimately, the experience that is created. And in most cases, the "consumer" interacts with the medium more or less alone (even if they sort of "share" their experience with others by sitting near them or talking about it after the fact). And perhaps the biggest point of contrast to me is that the consumer of passive media has no real option to make a choice about the content of the media or to experience anything different than from what the author has pre-loaded into the work.

The nature of criticism for these "passive" types of media, therefore, tends to focus mostly on the substance of the message delivered by the work, rather than on the "mechanics" of the delivery method. Now certainly, story structure, diction, tone, and other structural elements of how the work was delivered do come into play. But by and large, the bulk of literary and film criticism is much more about discussing the work's message, its relevance to the society in which it was made, its relation to previous works, what experience in the author's life led to it, and other such socio-political issues.

But boardgames are very different. With rare exception, games are meant to be shared, interactive experiences. And one hallmark of modern boardgames is player agency, where the participants are given choices that have a real impact on the outcome of the game. So while a game designer may have a general intent for how a game should develop, the specifics of any one particular play are greatly dependent on the choices of the players involved in it.

Therefore, the most important element of boardgame criticism must be to focus on the mechanical aspects of the game. While the core element of a work in pretty much any other medium is the message that is being conveyed, the core of a boardgame is the system of mechanics constructed by the designer. And even if there is a theme, tone, or message that the designer wants to invoke or portray in some manner, it still comes down to how well the mechanics of the game actually get that message across.
Lots to unpack in this excerpt and the post as a whole, and I disagree with almost all of it, but I'm busting tail to prep for Gen Con, so I'll leave this as a "No, Chris! Bad Chris! No cookie!" and let you all have at it for now.

Board Game: Catch Phrase!
• From the YouTube description of this Olde Payphone video: "Some people take Catchphrase way too seriously." NSFW. No, really.


(HT: The Dish)

Related

Game Preview: City of Horror

Game Preview: City of Horror

Aug 15, 2012

Nicolas Normandon's City of Horror, published by Repos Production and distributed by Asmodee, will be available in a limited quantity at Gen Con – the largest convention in the U.S. focused on...

Designer Diary: Milestones

Designer Diary: Milestones

Aug 14, 2012

The idea for the game Milestones came to me during a stay on the Mediterranean island of Mallorca, where the entire network of roads bears tightly-packed, white-yellow mile markers typical of the...

New Game Round-up: Worlds Collide in Consequential, Cutthroat Goes Digital & Even More Games at Gen Con

New Game Round-up: Worlds Collide in Consequential, Cutthroat Goes Digital & Even More Games at Gen Con

Aug 14, 2012

• Chris Cieslik at U.S. publisher Asmadi Games has announced a new game titled Consequential co-designed by him and Carl Chudyk that will be released in Q2 2013. Cieslik will have the game in...

Crowdfunding Round-up: Manhattan Re-Projected, Shadowfist Replayed & Locomotive Works Reworked

Crowdfunding Round-up: Manhattan Re-Projected, Shadowfist Replayed & Locomotive Works Reworked

Aug 14, 2012

• U.S. publisher Minion Games isn't satisfied with letting atom bomb research remain a thing of the past, so it plans to publish The Manhattan Project: Mega Expansion from designers Eric Jome...

New Game Round-up: Spartacus Moves from TV to Games, Rio Grande Releases for 2012 and Beyond & Rules for Star Wars: X-Wing

New Game Round-up: Spartacus Moves from TV to Games, Rio Grande Releases for 2012 and Beyond & Rules for Star Wars: X-Wing

Aug 13, 2012

• U.S. manufacturer Gale Force Nine, which has mostly produced miniature accessories, will release the board game Spartacus: A Game of Blood & Treachery in September 2012 after demoing it at...

ads