Here's an excerpt from that article, which kicked off with a recap of funds raised and projects supported since Kickstarter's founding in 2009:
So, today we're announcing our commitment to a more open, collaborative, and decentralized future. As a first step, we're supporting the development of an open source protocol that will essentially create a decentralized version of Kickstarter's core functionality. This will live on a public blockchain, and be available for collaborators, independent contributors, and even Kickstarter competitors, from all over the world to build upon, connect to, or use. We think bringing all that we've learned about crowdfunding since 2009 to inform the development of a decentralized protocol will open up exciting new opportunities for creative projects to come to life. In the coming weeks, a white paper will be released outlining the technology and plans for the protocol.
In the spirit of decentralization, we're establishing an independent organization that will kick off the development of the protocol. Kickstarter PBC will provide this new independent organization with some funding, appoint an initial board, and commit to being one of the protocol's earliest clients, meaning Kickstarter.com will be built on top of the protocol. As a user, the Kickstarter experience you're familiar with will stay the same. You won't "see" the protocol, but you will benefit from its improvements.
In addition, we're establishing an independent governance lab. Initially, this lab will be committed to overseeing the development of the protocol governance. Along the way it will publish research, share learnings, and generally seek to develop governance resources for the commons through openly engaging with the notoriously challenging problems and critically important goals of good governance. We are entering a significant moment for alternative governance models, and we think there's an important opportunity to advance these efforts using the blockchain. This lab will be led by Camille Canon, co-founder and most recently executive director of Purpose Foundation (US), an organization focused on developing and scaling alternative ownership and governance models.
We've chosen Celo, an open source and carbon negative blockchain platform, as the best technology and community on which to build the protocol. We're inspired by the Celo ecosystem's thoughtful approach to building the technology they want to see in the world. Like the internet in the early 1990s, the blockchain is a nascent technology whose story is not yet written. Celo's efforts around minimizing environmental impact (and focus on global accessibility through mobile access to the blockchain), reminds us that the best way to get better systems is to build better systems.
I read this announcement three times and have no idea what problem they’re trying to solve. Serious question- can someone - maybe even someone from @Kickstarter - explain it like I’m five? https://t.co/L424jF2jEO
— Geoff Engelstein (@gengelstein) December 9, 2021
An article on Bloomberg from Jackie Davalos features a possibly cynical explanation:
Today, money that might have once gone to Kickstarter campaigns is flowing through blockchains into what are known as distributed autonomous organizations, or DAOs. Last month, a group dubbed ConstitutionDAO mounted a crowdfunding campaign to buy a rare copy of the U.S. Constitution. It raised $46.3 million from thousands of contributors but failed to win the auction. The DAO offered refunds and disbanded.
The embrace of crypto could help Kickstarter regain some relevance. A raft of startups, as well as companies over a century old, are searching for ways to decentralize their digital infrastructure, often in a bid to lower costs.
That's why we're supporting the development of a decentralized crowdfunding protocol that will make it possible for people to launch and fund creative projects anywhere, whether it's on Kickstarter.com or someplace else on the web...
The protocol will live on Celo, a carbon-negative, public blockchain, be open source, and be available for collaborators, competitors, and independent contributors from all over the world to build upon, connect to, or use.
This openness enables everyone who is interested in the promise of crowdfunding to help build its future and have a say and stake in how it works. Blockchain will also open the potential to be rewarded for contributing to the systems that you use everyday...
Since everyone is invited to help contribute to the protocol and participate in the ecosystem, a wider array of good ideas will surface about how to transform crowdfunding for the better. As a result, more creative projects will ultimately find the tools and resources they need.
Or will it? Creator Jeeyon Shim has funded amazingly out-there and innovative games/art projects on Kickstarter, and this Twitter thread details her frustrations with the fiction of "a carbon-negative, public blockchain":
I cannot overemphasize how heartbroken this news makes me. Environmental stewardship isn’t just a big part of my work, it is one of my core values as a person. I genuinely love Kickstarter. I strongly urge the company to reconsider this decision.https://t.co/6hYPGJKYdD
— Jeeyon Shim 심지연 ✨🐅💨✨ (@jeeyonshim) December 8, 2021
By chance, U.S. publisher Floodgate Games tweeted a poll about NFTs on December 8 and was met with a similar volume of disgust, although it later clarified that "I'm asking purely out of our curiosity. No secret plans." (In September 2021, CMON Limited announced a partnership with Monsoon Digital for as-yet-to-be-detailed "digital collectible packs" that would be made available through Monsoon's NFT trading platform, and the response from commenters was similarly — and understandably — hostile.)
I've read the linked articles in the Kickstarter post, and I'm still in the dark as the concept of decentralized, blockchain-based networks does not seem like an improvement on what's come before, and NFTs seem like nothing more than smoke with a price tag. Any help?